Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing /Kling & Mckim (1999)

Citation - Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly Communication and the Continuum of Electronic Publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 890.

Keyword - scholarly communication

摘要

  • scholarly communication 在傳播實務上有三個特徵面向:(1)publicity 宣告 (2)access 取用 (3)trustworthiness 可信賴性
  • 對於「電子出版本質上具有擴大取用的特性」是ㄧ個過度簡化的認識。
  • 同儕評閱在學術傳播中的價值並不會因為可以自我發佈的電子媒體而取代。

Introduction

  • 電子學術出版的合法性(legitimacy)
  • 不同學科規範(disciplinarity)對於學術文件的合法性接受程度不同。物理學界可以認同工作報告(working paper)是一種合法的傳播格式,但是在電腦科學、心理學與化學界都數次嘗試禁止學術電子出版(現有紙本出版的數位化版本除外)。

Definitions

  • Varieties of Electronic Journals

Tensions in Scholarly Publishing

  • The Electronic Publishing Reform Movement
  • Internet Posting as Prior Publication: Practices and Policies
  • When Does Internet Posting Facilitate Scholarly Communication?

Policy Questions

  • Publication Status of Electronic Documents

Characterizing Scholarly Publishing

  • Scholarly Publishing as a Communicative Practice within a Community
  • When is a Document Effectively Published?
  • A Model of Scholarly Publishing

When Does Posting a Document on the Web Constitute Effective Publishing?

  • Self-Publishing on the Web
  • Publishing in an E-Journal
  • Publishing in the Virginia Tech Electronic Thesis Server

Posting a Document on the Web: Illustrative Examples

  • Table 1: Simple Posting Practice (Self-Publishing)
  • Table 2: Posting Practices on a Personally Controlled Web Space
  • Table 3: Posting Practices on an Institutionally Controlled Web Space
  • Table 4: Print Publication Practices

Has It Already Been Published?

Conclusion

Note