Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— | practice-led_research [2016/11/21 11:31] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == practice-led research | ||
+ | Practice-led research (PLR) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | > In practice-led research (PLR), the artifact has a central position in the academic research process. In PLR, ‘articulation and dissemination of the research findings take place both through the product of making [the artifact] and established means: these are seen as dialogical, interrelated and iterative (Faber, 2009). Practice informs knowledge which reciprocally informs practice.(Resmini, | ||
+ | > PLR, while including all the qualities of established institutional research | ||
+ | practices, strongly focuses on artifacts as the vessels of discursive | ||
+ | knowledge. This is an essential reason why PLR is so important to developing | ||
+ | design-based disciplines.(Resmini, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | > PLR, although variously defined, can be considered to be a ‘self-reflexive’ form of research where: | ||
+ | > • the artist / designer / creative practitioner provides a rigorous critical analysis of their work, positioning it within broader contextual / theoretical / historical / discursive research paradigms; | ||
+ | > • articulation of the processes involved in making the product of research form an important part of the research findings; | ||
+ | > • articulation and dissemination of the research findings takes place both through the product of making and established academic means. These are seen as dialogical and interrelated (Faber, 2009:7). | ||
+ | (Resmini, 2010)((Resmini, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Metadata/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{backlinks> | ||
+ | {{tag>}} |