User Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


domain_analysis [2018/12/19 19:03] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +== Domain Analysis [領域分析] ==
  
 +Domain analysis / 領域分析 (information science)
 +
 +# 在資訊系統開發與管理的學科中,領域分析被視為一種協助解決系統開發與設計問題的方法。例如:領域分析是一種確認與組織[系統的]問題類別,即問題的領域(範圍),的知識過程;以助於描述與解決問題。是為了分析軟體再用性(reuse)問題而發展的,形成許多關於領域分析的理論與實作,並發展出以上定義。(Arango & Prieto-Diaz, 1991)
 +# 另一種領域分析定義,認為是在研究中考慮資訊科學中社會性因素的一種取向與做法。例如:思想社群或論述社群作為知識領域(knowledge-domain),即社會分工之一部份,進行研究分析。Hjorland 依循這種定義,引入資訊科學研究,希望資訊研究能進一步探索知識的社會、生態和內容。(Hjorland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. ,1995)(([[:study:Hjorland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a New Horizon in Information Science]]: Domain-Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425.))
 +
 +==resources==
 +===Journal articals
 +* Albrechtsen, H., & Hjorland, B. (1997). [[:study:Albrechtsen, H., Hjorland, B. (1997). Information seeking and knowledge organization|Information seeking and knowledge organization: The presentation of a new book]]. Knowledge Organization, 24(3), 136.
 +* Albrechtsen, H., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2003). [[:study:Albrechtsen, H., Pejtersen, A. M. (2003). Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes|Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes]]. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 213.
 +* Hartel, J. (2003). [[:study:Hartel, J. (2003). The serious leisure frontier in library and information science-- Hobby domains|The serious leisure frontier in library and information science: Hobby domains]]. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 228.
 +* [[:study:Hjorland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a New Horizon in Information Science]]: Domain-Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425. 
 +* [[:study:Hjorland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1999). An analysis of some trends in classification research]]. Knowledge Organization, 26(3), 131.
 +* [[:study:Hjorland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science]]: Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422.
 +* Hjorland, B. (2003). Fundamentals of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 30(2), 87-111.
 +* Hjorland, B. (2005). [[:study:Hjorland, B. (2005). The socio-cognitive theory of user situated in specific contexts and domains|The socio-cognitive theory of user situated in specific contexts and domains]]. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez & L. E. F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 339-343). Medford, New Jersey: Information Today Inc.
 +* Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(6), 321-343.
 +* Sundin, O. (2003). Towards an understanding of symbolic aspects of professional information: An analysis of the nursing knowledge domain. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 170.
 +* Tennis, J. T. (2003). [[:study:Tennis, J. T. (2003). Two axes of domains for domain analysis|Two axes of domains for domain analysis]]. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 191.
 +* Zins, C., & Guttmann, D. (2003). Domain analysis of social work: An example of an integrated methodological approach. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 196.
 +* 王知津. (1997). 領域分析及其對情報檢索的啟示. 情報理論與實踐 (南京大學), 20, pp.151-154,157.
 +* 呂斌, & 李國秋. (1997). 情報學研究的前沿——領域分析. 情報理論與實踐 (北京大學), 1997(2), 69-73.
 +
 +==activities==
 +{{rss>http://www.43things.com/rss/entries/goal?goal_id=343754 10}}
 +
 +==Meta
 +{{backlinks>.}}
 +{{tag>LIS}}