== System Usability Scale (SUS)

# I think that I would like to use this system frequently.
# I found the system unnecessarily complex.
# I thought the system was easy to use.
# I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system.
# I found the various functions in this system were well integrated.
# I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system.
# I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly.
# I found the system very cumbersome to use.
# I felt very confident using the system.
# I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system.


中譯

# 我想我會經常使用它
# 它不需要做得這麼複雜
# 它是容易使用的
# 它需要有人協助指導才能使用
# 它把各種功能整合的很好
# 它有太多不一致性
# 我想大多數的人都可以很快的學會使用它
# 它用起來太龐大且複雜
# 我想我可以很有把握的使用它
# 用它之前，需要先學會很多東西

中譯說明
* 英文強調「我」的個人意見。在台灣(也許華文或東亞都有)的情境下，即便是怎麼強調個人只要涉及價值評估，不免都還是會訴諸於「適當」的標準。因此，為了題意簡潔，把「我認為」之類的字眼都去掉。相關提示在問卷一開始的說明項目解說，而不再題項內影響受測者解讀內容。

== Note 

Bangor,Kortum & Miller (2009) 增加了一個題項 #11，來解決分數實際上的態度語意問題。

Over all, I would rate the user-friendlyness of this product as: \\ 
整體而言，我給這個產品在好用性上的評價是：





== Metadata/Backlinks 

{{backlinks>.}}
{{tag>usability}}