== Towards new ways of terminology description: the sociocognitive-approach / Temmerman, R. (2000)==

**Citation** - Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards new ways of terminology description: the sociocognitive-approach: John Benjamins publishing company.


**Keyword** - [[:terminology]]

==TOC==
* Introduction
* From principles of standardisation to a scientific study of terminology
* New propositions for Terminology
* From traditional definitions of concepts to templates of units of understanding
* Univocity and polysemy
* The impact of metaphorical models on categorisarion and naming
* Towards new ways of terminology description
* Bibliography
* Index
== Ch1 From Principles of Standardisation to a Scientific Study of Terminology==
第一章 由標準化原則到術語的科學研究：術語學研究的新方向

* 傳統術語學：相信需要標準化，才能改善特定語言的傳播問題。 \\ The traditional schools believed in the need for standardisation in order to improve special language communication.(p.1)

傳統術語學基於一些未被質疑的前提：

* 概念在充分條件下，是能被定義清楚的。\\ that concepts are clear-cut and can be defined on the basis of necessary and sufficient conditions, 
* 詞彙的一義性(univocity)是意義明確的基礎，才能達到有效的傳播。 \\ that univocity of terms is essential for unambiguous and therefore effective and efficient communication, 
* 比喻性的語言與意義變化與術語學無關，術語學限於討論稱名問題。 \\ figurative language and change of meaning are linguistic subjects which are of no concern to Terminology as Terminology restricts itself to the onomasiological perspective. 


===1.2 維也納術語學派的術語學原則 The principles of the Vienna school for Terminology===

* 第一原則：稱名學的觀點 The first principle: the onomasiological perspective: 目的在於清楚的描繪每個概念 aims to clearly delineate each concept
* 第二原則：概念需明確 The second principle: concepts are clear-cut
* 第三原則：術語定義概念的方法 The third principle: concepts and terminological definitions
** ISO standard 704 (1995) Terminology Work — Principles and Methods: 三種方法(a)內涵 intensional ,b) 外延 extensional or c) 部份與整體 part-whole
* 第四原則：一義性 The fourth principle: the univocity principle
* 第五原則：同時性 Fifth principle: the synchrony principle. 傳統術語學並未研究語言與的發展與演進，因此只強調靜態的概念系統。

^ 傳統術語學原則 ^ Temmerman(2000) 的批評 ^
| 術語學只考量概念而非語言 | 語言在形成概念與溝通中扮演重要角色 |
| 概念可以清晰的被安置在本體論架構概念系統上 | 概念與範疇是模糊的不能被絕對地邏輯與本體化 |
| 理想上，概念由其內涵定義 | 內涵定義通常是不可能 |
| 一個概念對照一個詞 | 多義、同義、比較性語言在特定語言上也起作用 |
| 概念與術語的關係是永久的 | 範疇會演化，詞義會變化，理解會不同 |
Figure 1.1. Contrast between the principles of traditional Terminology and the reality of the terminology we have been studying in the special language of the life sciences. (p.16)
===1.3-6===

* The limits that are posed on unprejudiced research in Terminology
* Different schools of Terminology
* Recent criticism on traditional Terminology
* Towards sociocognitive Terminology



== Note ==

== Metadata/Backlinks ==

{{backlinks>.}}
{{tag>terminology}}

**file link** - [[google.s>temmerman r. 2000 . towards new ways of terminology description|Google Schloar]], [[xxcfile>temmerman r. 2000 . towards new ways of terminology description|XXC]]