== Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience / Meyer, Debackere, & Glänzel(2010)==

**Citation** - Meyer, M., Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2010). Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics, 85(2), 527-539.


**Keyword** -

應用科學能是好科學嗎？探索奈米科學專利引用與引文影響


==Abstract==
* 探索奈米科學專利引用與引文影響
* 引用技術專利的論文，比起沒有提到技術的論文，在書目計量指標中表現較好。 \\ Our observations indicate that patent-cited papers perform better in terms of standard bibliometric indicators than comparable publications that are not linked to technology in this way. 
* 在專利中被引用的論文，也更常被其他論文所引用。 \\ More specifically, we found that articles cited in patents are more likely to be cited also by other papers. 
* 研究顯示，從眾效應的存在與相關性驅使著科技的發展。\\ Our analyses further demonstrate the presence and the relevance of bandwagon effects driving the development of science and technology.

== Content ==

== Note ==

== Metadata/Backlinks ==

{{backlinks>.}}
{{tag>scientometrics}}

**file link** - [[google.s>meyer m. debackere k. glaenzel w. 2010 . can applied science be good science|Google Schloar]], [[xxcfile>meyer m. debackere k. glaenzel w. 2010 . can applied science be good science|XXC]]